Optimal Titles: SEO Case Study

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Read my top posts or learn more about Michael Gray. Want more frequent updates follow me on Twitter. Thanks for visiting!

SEO Case Study: Optimal Title Structure

Experiment: To determine what the optimal structure is for a title soley for page ranking.

Hypothesis: Page titles are one the most important on page ranking factors, and achieving the best layout will help a page rank for it’s desired phrase. I believe that that [Keyword Phrase : Title] will rank higher than any other construct, followed by [Keyword Phrase] in isolation.

Procedure: To test my theory I created the following experimental files:

To allow you to see the results I published the files on this website. However to keep the experiment valid and free from “tampering” I repeated the experiment on two other websites, who’s URL’s I will keep secret (from this point forward known as control group 1 and control group 2). To keep the results as pure as possible I created a 4 word phrase combinations which had no websites showing results at the inception of this test.

From this test it appears that Google favors [Keyword Phrase : Sitename] and MSN favors [Keyword Phrase]. Yahoo however seems to have a problem indexing all of the files quickly, so no conclusions can be made about Yahoo’s rankings. Additionally conducting an [allintitle:Keyword Phrase] and [allintitle:"Keyword Phrase"] yielded the same results on Google.

One test on Google yielded slightly different results. As has been observed in other tests, Google results often seem to vary slightly with testing samples. This is probably do to “intellegent factoring” of multiple aspects in Google’s ranking algorthym (either that or Matt’s messing with me).

When I take over an existing website or start working with a client’s existing website, the first two things I will look at and change are the title tags and internal anchor text. From my experience these are the two changes that give you the most bang for your buck. If you have new website or a sandboxed website it may be more beneficial for you to leave the page titles with just the keyword phrase until you can get enough trust/quality/link diversity to get organic traffic from Google. Just make sure you make it easy to go back and change/adjust. Alternatively you could try cloaking IP specific delivery for your title tags, but I’ve never tried it myself, although it seemed to work for Google until they banned themselves.

Again these tests would be more conclusive if others repeated them over a wide variety of domains and published the results. As an incentive if you don’t do it on an uber spammy website, I will link to your published test results.

Sphere It

7 Responses to “Optimal Titles: SEO Case Study”

1. J Wynia Says:
   December 22nd, 2005 at 3:45 pm

   This confirms what I have tested (though more organically). When I switched my personal Wordpress site to:

   1. Use keyword phrases toward the beginning of the post title.
   2. Make all post titles H1 tags and the site title into a special class of H2 (or nothing but a div on some sites).
   3. Made the post title as the first portion of the page title.
   4. Added a list of popular and recent posts to the bottom of single post pages (internal link with the exact same keyword structure).
   5. Ensured that permalinks used the post titles as well.

   Suddenly everything I wrote about jumped up the rankings. In many cases that means a jump from page 450 to 150, but it’s showing as lots of weird #1 placements as well.

   It’s a repeating of the keywords in the URL, page title, H1 tag and internal linking and is a really powerful combination. I’ve been calling it the keyword pyramid.

2. Notabenes Blog » Blog-arkiv » Det perfekte title tag… Says:
   January 2nd, 2006 at 7:15 pm

   [...] … er jo central i et optimerings-øjemed, og den siges at være fundet nu og skal såmænd se sådan her ud: [søgefrase: titel]. Det er Seomoz, der selv citerer, og jeg citerer, “… Michael (Graywolf)“. Det har nok anet os, men nu er forskellige SEO’er altså gået i gang med at gribe det mere metodisk an. Hvis du selv bidrager med at teste titel-kombinationer og offentliggører dine resultater, så lover Michael Graywolf dig et gratis link fra hans blog, og det er jo ikke så ringe endda. [...]

3. Administrator Says:
   January 8th, 2006 at 9:17 pm

   Update 1/8/2005

   Google
   keywords
   site title : Keywords
   Keywords : site title
   Not in title

   Yahoo
   Keywords : Site title

4. SEO Blog » Den Perfekte Sidetitel Says:
   January 26th, 2006 at 5:56 am

   [...] På Wolf-howl.com har man derfor valgt at lave et lille eksperiment, for at se hvilke titler der fortolkes bedst. Resultatet er ikke ligefrem revolutionerende, men stadig interessant. Så vidt Google angår, er de kommet frem til at “[nøgleord] : [sidetitel]” virker bedst, og det er jo bestemt noget man kan bruge helt konkret. [...]

5. Optimalni naslovi spletnih strani « rufbetten [moje postelje] Says:
   January 28th, 2006 at 6:24 pm

   [...] Po tejle raziskavi so najboljši naslovi (<title> tag) spletnih strani sestavljeni takole: besedna zveza: naslov strani [...]

6. How to Write an Optimized Title Tag : SEO Profile Internet Marketing Blog Says:
   February 24th, 2006 at 11:12 pm

   [...] according to Michael (Graywolf) at his site, Wolf-Howl.com. Many people agree with this, including me (I’ve been using the formula for years,) but I wonder how many keywords you could include in the title and whether or not Google will recognize that as spamming. I would think that as long as they describe the content, appear on the page and are not repetitive, it would be okay. [...]

7. Coburn Says:
   April 23rd, 2006 at 5:47 am

   Worthwhile checking out the expanded discussion on Randfish’s blog on Titles:
   seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1010

   The question is for competitive kw phrases, which gives the best long-term ROI? Many factors at play, hard to know which is best. So perhaps Wolf’s approach of focussing on the SERP’s is best. Even then, this experiment looks at uncompetitive kw phrases. Question begs therefore: What would happen if these kw phrases had a few million competitors in the SERPs?