Google Gives Wikipedia a Handjob on Groundhog’s Day

Michael Gray

By Michael Gray
In Google, SEO  

Print Post Print Post Email Post Email Post    ADD TO STUMBLEUPON Sphinn It ADD TO DEL.ICIO.US  Tweet This

I’m not sure why someone would need to do this but the serp for Ground Hog’s Day looks an awful lot like a handjob to  me.
(screen shot after the jump)

Added: after reading Matt’s comments and doing more investigating it appears this a new UI SERP and not a hand edit at all

Related posts:

  1. Wikipedia Invades Google News The follow
  2. Google Loves Wikipedia – Even the Empty Pages If you
  3. How to Invalidate Wikipedia Articles Recently G

Crazyegg Link Tracking

{ 2 trackbacks }

Irishwonder’s Black Hat SEO Blog » New Google feature? Special treatment for SEO Chat?
February 17, 2006 at 10:50 am
Threadjacking - SEO BUZZBOX
February 19, 2006 at 12:17 pm

{ 7 comments }

IrishWonder February 17, 2006 at 9:55 am

This one : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=seo&btnG=Google+Search looks even funnier to me – does SEOCHat have some special deal with Google to display a ton of links to their internal pages (SEO Forums – Future PageRank, Google Dance – Google Optimization) – nobody else in the SERPs gets that special treatment.

As for the Groundhog day, I believe it’s might even be some special new feature – notice the words “According to…) before the Wikipedia link? Might be something similar to definitions… I am guessing this is because of the way how the search query is formulated – in the form of a natural question… Don’t know if it’s any different for you, but for me a simple search for “Groundhog day” brings totally different results from this query in your screenshot, and no link to Wikipedia…

Matt Cutts February 17, 2006 at 11:55 am

Do you think we did a hand job for [what is economics] or [what is barbeque] or [what is arbitrage]? Why leap to that conclusion about Groundhog’s Day?

(To answer the question, I believe this was algorithmic and no money was involved. So no hand job.)

IrishWonder, I left a post over at your blog about [seo] but it doesn’t look like you’ve approved it. But the short answer is to read
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ui-fun-better-queries/
to see how that feature is also algorithmic with no money involved, aka no hand job there either.

IrishWonder February 17, 2006 at 12:07 pm

Matt, sorry about that, comments on my blog don’t work, only trackback ping does and I can’t get around to fixing that…. Can you email me your comment so I can post it as an update to my post?

Administrator February 17, 2006 at 12:09 pm

Ok it’s not a specific hand job but it’s not just as simple as typing [what is x]. For example [what is a full house] triggers the programming but [what is a good credit score] doesn’t. What’s with all the favoritism being shown for wikipedia, that place is wildly inaccurate, heck they thought even you were too spammy to link to (go figure).

Andy Hagans February 17, 2006 at 3:02 pm

Pretty sure this is just an extension to Google definitions or whatever a la Ask Jeeves.

Aaron Pratt February 18, 2006 at 3:10 pm

Anyone know who/how they update definitions? I have a glossary on a blog that seems to just be ignored. Are definition lists hand picked by nuns?

Philipp Lenssen February 19, 2006 at 5:22 pm

Looks like the old Google Q&A feature to me.
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-04-07-n20.html

Comments on this entry are closed.