<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alt Tags Back in Black?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/</link>
	<description>Michael Gray rants on SEO the internet and  media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:58:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/comment-page-1/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll file this under: &quot;If you had tested it for yourself instead of believeing what all the &#039;gurus&#039; wrote, you would have never stopped using it.&quot;... Other than &quot;Stop ya whining and do something about it,&quot; the only other SEO mantra I live by is: &quot;Don&#039;t believe anything you read unless you test it yourself.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll file this under: &#8220;If you had tested it for yourself instead of believeing what all the &#8216;gurus&#8217; wrote, you would have never stopped using it.&#8221;&#8230; Other than &#8220;Stop ya whining and do something about it,&#8221; the only other SEO mantra I live by is: &#8220;Don&#8217;t believe anything you read unless you test it yourself.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TallTroll</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/comment-page-1/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator>TallTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/#comment-6654</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Wonder how stuffing the title attribute compares?

I&#039;ve seen pretty good evidence it doesn&#039;t, at least for the  element</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Wonder how stuffing the title attribute compares?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen pretty good evidence it doesn&#8217;t, at least for the  element</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Evans Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/comment-page-1/#comment-6560</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Evans Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/#comment-6560</guid>
		<description>Wonder how stuffing the title attribute compares?

Having been brainwashed by semantic markup cultists as a child that is usually where I let myself be verbose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder how stuffing the title attribute compares?</p>
<p>Having been brainwashed by semantic markup cultists as a child that is usually where I let myself be verbose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pagespank</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/comment-page-1/#comment-6553</link>
		<dc:creator>pagespank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/seo/alt-tags-back-in-black/#comment-6553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also seen some old school spamming clearing up in google - turn off javascript and check this out:

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:FIZRKovwq1wJ:www.cadillacpostcards.com/Radiohead.html+download+radiohead+sheet+music&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=3

Number 2 for [download radiohead sheet music], and #6 for [download radiohead music]. You can pretty much insert any artist in that query, with varying amounts of results like this. Slightly niche terms perhaps, but still - javascript redirects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also seen some old school spamming clearing up in google &#8211; turn off javascript and check this out:</p>
<p><a href="http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:FIZRKovwq1wJ:www.cadillacpostcards.com/Radiohead.html+download+radiohead+sheet+music&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=3" rel="nofollow">http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:FIZRKovwq1wJ:www.cadillacpostcards.com/Radiohead.html+download+radiohead+sheet+music&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=3</a></p>
<p>Number 2 for [download radiohead sheet music], and #6 for [download radiohead music]. You can pretty much insert any artist in that query, with varying amounts of results like this. Slightly niche terms perhaps, but still &#8211; javascript redirects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
