Links to the Sites. You are granted a limited, nonexclusive right to create a hypertext link to the homepage of the Sites, provided such link does not portray Cingular Wireless or any of its products and services in a false, misleading, derogatory, or otherwise defamatory manner. You may not use a Cingular or Cingular Wireless logo or other proprietary graphic or trademark of Cingular or Cingular Wireless to link to the Sites without the express written permission of Cingular Wireless. This limited right may be revoked at any time.
Hey Cingular I can link to you any way I want and with any words I want like T-Mobile, Alltell and Sprint go ahead try and come after me cause I’ll tell the world how cingular sucks. Oh and if you are a lawyer for Cingular I will reprint any corespondance or legal notices you send to me.
Linking policies are genearally moronic but in the right industry a no-linking policy can even become linkbait 
and if you’re in the market try a AT&T goPhone or a go phone
Related posts:- AT&T and Cingular You Suck AT&T and Cingular I’m a present customer and I have...
- iPhone & AT&T – Older Brands are Not Always Better Brands So it’s iPhone day and the only way you can...
- Why Advertisers Love Flash and Ajax, and Why it’s Really Stupid Steve Rubel has a smashingly good bit of conversation bait...
See my disclaimer about advertising and affiliate links
{ 13 comments }
You should nofollow the links
Still laughing
Mr. Wolf, you are a cyberpirate, aka a person of ill repute.
dude…..you are nuts!!!!….lolol….:)
ha ha ha … that is great!
He’s not crazy … or nuts … he’s 100% right!
Darin
I’m disappointed Michael. I stumble across this, make a blog post, send you a tip, link you to my blog post for the content, and you don’t even cite me as your source.
@harry dude what are you smoking, I didn’t get this from you at all?
Michael,
I don’t want to come off wrong, there’s nothing wrong with you posting it at all. You didn’t get my email? Okay, that’s all right. Where did you find this though? There are 3-4 other sources on the internet talking about it right now (Consumerist, SEOMoz, DSL Reports, etc), and every one of them cite me, so did you just take the story and strip the source out?
I’ve been reading your blog daily for a long time, and I have a very high respect for you Michael, don’t get me wrong, and I’ll continue to read it despite this. Getting into a debate isn’t worth a link; maybe I was wrong to have mentioned it at all.
Best of luck,
- Harry
I came across it on digg
Ah, the Digg article linked to Techdirt, which sourced DSL Reports, which sourced me.
Oh well. Sorry about that.
Lol!!! Still laughing for now! Dude! That’s so funny.. giving you rules on how to link them! RFLOL
Anti-linking policies have been around for years. I used to write about them, way back when. The site that used to track sites with no link or complicated link policies finally gave up, but the site remains intact.
http://www.dontlink.com
Used to be a delightful read, guaranteed to make your blood boil!
“Linking policies are genearally moronic but in the right industry a no-linking policy can even become linkbait
”
Are you referring to that Boston hair doctor? She had a crazy linking policy, too… didn’t she?
Comments on this entry are closed.