<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google iPhone Voice Search &#8211; It&#8217;s All About the Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/</link>
	<description>Michael Gray rants on SEO the internet and  media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:58:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64500</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64500</guid>
		<description>@Will: umm no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Will: umm no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64496</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64496</guid>
		<description>&quot;But frankly, Google is way ahead of its competitors in terms of innovations and applications. &quot;

Yes, all of them.  Especially Jaiku, Orkut, and the now defunct Lively. 

Sidenote, if Google wants Jaiku to do better, just pay CNN 1 million a month to say, &quot;Follow us on Jaiku&quot; instead of Twitter.  Since they&#039;re not actually endorsing Jaiku by mentioning it, the FTC won&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But frankly, Google is way ahead of its competitors in terms of innovations and applications. &#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, all of them.  Especially Jaiku, Orkut, and the now defunct Lively. </p>
<p>Sidenote, if Google wants Jaiku to do better, just pay CNN 1 million a month to say, &#8220;Follow us on Jaiku&#8221; instead of Twitter.  Since they&#8217;re not actually endorsing Jaiku by mentioning it, the FTC won&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64495</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64495</guid>
		<description>I have to comment here about your inlinks.com post above because you turned off comments.  My comment is about the fact that you turned off comments.  Are you nuts?  (Well, yes, that was obvious after I watched your three videos on 1938media.com where you came across as a wild loon) but I don&#039;t understand your logic about turning off comments on that post, depriving yourself of all the longtail traffic.  Why can&#039;t you just allow comments w/out commenting yourself? Re-enable comments on that post, there&#039;s something that needs to be said...a lot of things actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to comment here about your inlinks.com post above because you turned off comments.  My comment is about the fact that you turned off comments.  Are you nuts?  (Well, yes, that was obvious after I watched your three videos on 1938media.com where you came across as a wild loon) but I don&#8217;t understand your logic about turning off comments on that post, depriving yourself of all the longtail traffic.  Why can&#8217;t you just allow comments w/out commenting yourself? Re-enable comments on that post, there&#8217;s something that needs to be said&#8230;a lot of things actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64449</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64449</guid>
		<description>Only God knows where Google will stop! But frankly, it is way ahead of its competitors in terms of innovations and applications. This is just one of those Google innovations to keep with time and ahead of competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only God knows where Google will stop! But frankly, it is way ahead of its competitors in terms of innovations and applications. This is just one of those Google innovations to keep with time and ahead of competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64446</guid>
		<description>I downloaded and  tried it out, and, in a moderately nosy environment (office hallway) it gave random results, but in a quiet environment it worked pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded and  tried it out, and, in a moderately nosy environment (office hallway) it gave random results, but in a quiet environment it worked pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 31231</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64445</link>
		<dc:creator>31231</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64445</guid>
		<description>Michael you know of any good iPhone simulators out there that test more than just resolution, also test actual compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael you know of any good iPhone simulators out there that test more than just resolution, also test actual compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64440</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64440</guid>
		<description>@Jaan Kanellis: link fixed thanks

no all the simulators require you load all this java and other crap havent found one that works well yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jaan Kanellis: link fixed thanks</p>
<p>no all the simulators require you load all this java and other crap havent found one that works well yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64437</guid>
		<description>Michael you know of any good iPhone simulators out there that test more than just resolution, also test actual compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael you know of any good iPhone simulators out there that test more than just resolution, also test actual compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64425</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64425</guid>
		<description>@kathryn: yep thats it. I&#039;d also imagine google would allows advertisers to target local mobile searches only, there are lots of categories where it would make sense and google would gain customers who wouldn&#039;t normally advertise with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kathryn: yep thats it. I&#8217;d also imagine google would allows advertisers to target local mobile searches only, there are lots of categories where it would make sense and google would gain customers who wouldn&#8217;t normally advertise with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-iphone-voice-search/comment-page-1/#comment-64424</link>
		<dc:creator>kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolf-howl.com/?p=2133#comment-64424</guid>
		<description>so what you&#039;re saying is .......in a few months the first screen hit will show ads after the &quot;adoption&quot; phase?? Makes sense. Very clear post though - easy to understand and hey I can&#039;t pronounce those names for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what you&#8217;re saying is &#8230;&#8230;.in a few months the first screen hit will show ads after the &#8220;adoption&#8221; phase?? Makes sense. Very clear post though &#8211; easy to understand and hey I can&#8217;t pronounce those names for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
